A Man For All Treasons

 

Granada Studios, Subterranean Broadcasting House, March 19th, 2034.

 Female Reporter’s Voice:

 

            If you have had your Newscaster lobe operational these days, there is no way that you will have been able to escape the news of the demise of the former Italian politician, entrepreneur, bon viveur and scandal magnet Enrico Fettuccini, who has died in the Scaloni Prison in Milan aged 81.

 

A man who surely requires no introduction from us and who has historical volumes a plenty devoted to him, but tonight we wanted to provide a different angle on a man who is famous, or should I say infamous, the world over. Yet what we know is often limited to hearsay, exaggerated beyond all belief to accommodate the solely accepted view of Fettuccini being the devil’s representative on the Earth, a man so inherently evil and twisted that he must have been born without a modicum of goodness, manufactured maybe, rather than born. The product of everything that is rotten and wicked in our society. A man who took advantage of everyone and everything that came in his path to create a vast personal fortune and rose to the highest levels of power, only, for when he was brought toppling down, he would return stronger than before, convincing the evermore gullible public that he was repentant, only for his next attack to go further, to hurt deeper. Or have we all missed something? Did he have a message that we failed to comprehend?

 

We have tracked down four people who were close to him in four pivotal periods in his life: A teacher from that harsh childhood riddled with poverty that would shape his drive in later life. His personal assistant from 1981 to 2002, a person who remained loyal in testing times. His second wife, and lastly, his cellmate, the latter being the only person in whom he confided in the final years of his life.

 

With these testimonies, the aim is to create a fuller account of a man about whom millions and millions of words have been written, andwhose real modus operandi has been interpreted by every historical commentator and occupants of bars since the early eighties.

 

Ladies and Gentlemen, we give you. The Real Enrico Fettuccini.

 

The screen goes dark. The first image to appear is a wheat field in Northern Italy. A vehicle heads down the unmarked road into the town of Rottofreno, Fettuccini’s birthplace, a small town, less than ten miles from the city of Piacenza. The shot continues through the town, intermingling photos from the fifties of the last century with images from the present day. We stop at what was the site of the Fettuccini family home, the old yellowing photographshows a large family dressed in meagre attire on the porch of a house, badly in need of a lick of paint and some attention from someone with greater handyman skills than any of the Fettuccini males possessed.

 

The image of the old house slowly fades and is replaced by the current occupant of the space, a rather dilapidated laundrette run by a Chinese family. The owner is asked about the Fettuccini residence, but asks for the camera to be turned off. The town has not decided to cash on its most famous former resident, the local council had a Fettuccini museum closed down despite the roaring trade it was doing, they chose to knock down the house to prevent the unwanted pilgrimages of devotees who still saw good in the man.

 

One of the buildings that Enrico would still recognise is the old school, now a primary school solely, but in those days, it handled an intake of infants up to pre-university students for a town with, at the time, less than four-thousand inhabitants. Obviously, most of his school pals are in the same place as Fettuccini, or in no state to offer a testimony to our programme, yet, whilst doing research for the same, in an old house next to the school, a box of VHS videos were found that contained recordings made for a fictional version of the early life of Enrico. The recordings featured interviews with the schoolmaster who would have seen him enter the institution as a pasty and underfed child of five, and the boy who left for Milan University thirteen years later, with the ideas in place that would define his actions for the following sixty-three.

 

The presenter appears again to tell us that the first videos were not made specifically for this programme, but nonetheless represent a valuable testimony and insight into the early life of this fascinating subject.

 

Once again, the screen goes black. That grainy image that every VHS owner will recall with certain alacrity appears before the image steadies and we see a man in his late sixties, posing almost with visible cringe before the backdrop of a schoolmaster’s room featuring crude daubings on the blackboard and even an apple on the desk.

 

The man is frail. A lifetime in rural classrooms has not been kind to him. The year is 1998, it is a cold afternoon in November and the director’s drive to film the piece in the same schoolroom where Fettuccini was a student is already beginning to have a tiresome effect on the teacher, Mister di Marco, who seems to wonder why he has agreed to this after all this time. It is confirmed that the camera is rolling, and he begins to speak. There are no questions, he just speaks, maybe the idea was to edit questions in afterwards that would make his responses seem all the more pertinent, but no-one ever got that far.

 

Signore di Marco:

 

“Of course, I remember the very first day he walked into the school. I had taught his brothers and sisters, so in some way, I knew what to expect. You’d be surprised how many kids I recognise, even now, after all these years, I can see a forty-year old bloke in the street and remember when he was five, when he cried because he had lost his pencil or when he scored a goal at playtime. Even though our school is tiny, a lifetime working there has meant thousands of children have passed through its doors, I can remember every one of them, to a lesser or greater extent.

 

            I try not to prejudge kids before they take their seat at the desk. The Fettuccini’s came from renowned stock, my father taught their parents, they had taken to fascism in the thirties with a degree of enthusiasm that even across the border in Germany was considered excessive. It seemed like a wise move at the time, many others made the same decision. Why not back the winners? It seemed like only someone prepared to go that extra distance would be able to pull us out of the mire in which we were drowning. Of course, looking back now, it appears laughable, but you have to have been in such a miserable situation to see how these ideas could flourish so easily. We like to think that we have come a long way since, but we’re no different, we believe we are modern sophisticates ready for the twenty-first century, worldly-wise, wholly protected from and unsusceptible to outside influences, independent thinking-mechanisms, the product of education, but hatred will return, if it ever left. We like to look back with horror and proudly boast that we would never go down that route, whilst already marking its path on our maps. I’m sorry, I’m rambling, I guess this is not what you wanted.” He turned his gaze upwards to the camera pleadingly.

 

            “That’s fine.” Says a voice off-shot. “Just keep talking and we’ll keep filming. We want you to feel comfortable so that the memories flood out.”

 

            “Well, I’m not saying there is any justification to their actions, thousands of Italian families made wrong decisions at that time, but it’s easy with the benefit of hindsight to judge and decry those actions, but until you have had a metaphorical, and physical, gun pointing at your head and forcing you down one road or another, you can never know what it is like. You can always say that you would have preferred to die than to go with the fascists, of course you would! You will never have to make that decision. We were there. We made that decision for you so that you hopefully will never have to. That is the difference.”

 

            Again, a voice off-screen asks him for his earliest recollection of Enrico, obviously trying to speed things along.

 

            “The first day he cried. And the second, and the third. He cried when people were horrible to him, but he cried more when people were nice to him. He gobbled up every morsel placed before him, anything that was leftover went to him. There were poor kids in the class, but none were so open about their need to take on as many calories as possible at the school, lest the evening see bare cupboards once more. They called him ‘spazzatura’(a subtitle appeared below in English with the translation “Rubbish Bin”), he was only happy when he was eating.

 

            He was slow. He was five, but could pass for three. He could barely string two sentences together and looked lost at every juncture. I never like to compare, but if you put the sixteen kids I had in that class (a luxury, I know, I had friends teaching in Milan and Piacenza to classes of forty, my father spent a time in Turin with classes of seventy) and point out which ones would make it in life, I wouldn’t have bet an old lira on Enrico. Though I guess if you could see any of the people who went on to greatness aged five, you probably would not have given them a second look.

 

            The first year at school was tough for him. Especially the winter, that would have been 1958. Times were tough, here they still are, but life back then was harsher. His family lost everything after the war. It was before Enrico’s time, but he knew that they had fallen from grace. The ironic thing of the time was that they kept the house, but that was like almost worse, as if watching it dilapidate around them was further punishment. Things worked differently in those days, they couldn’t sell it and get somewhere cheaper, but they couldn’t afford the upkeep, either. They could have done any number of things with the place, I told them to spruce it up a bit and get lodgers in. They were building the first of the new railways and, although things were bad, the north of Italy was nowhere near as bad as the south. But the father never recovered, he got off light, fascist collaborators in France took a much worse fate but here we were more lenient,I suppose there was more collective guilt, others might have been subtler about it.

           

            What was painful to watch was Enrico’s helplessness. His elder brothers and sisters had managed to shake off the family curse and make their marks in miscellaneous forms of delinquency. Enrico just wandered in the shadow of his parents, traipsing behind his mother in the market as she bartered for everything she purchased, and scurrying from the anger of his father as he drank away the little pittance they had.

 

            There was a day, here my memory comes into its own, and with other kids I cannot pinpoint such moments of epiphany. But aged 9, on the 3rdof March 1962, his father had a fall while inebriated and slipped into a coma from which he would never wake. That day, Enrico walked into the school without the stoop that normally accompanied his mignon frame, he stood tall, as if he had been born on that day, as if a 9 -year external gestation period had ceased, and it was now him and his mother.

 

            In days, his manner changed towards the staff and the pupils. Everyone had simply accepted that the boy had no academic ability and had left him to his own devices in the class. Yet somehow the boy had absorbed the knowledge drifting around the classroom. He could read and write, he could add and subtract, I am tempted to say he had become reborn, but he had enjoyed no life until this point, so this simply a naissance.

 

            He made up for lost time at the same rate as his mother. She huddled together a group of tenants and made THEM pay for the refurbishment of the property before they could move in. With a promise of a cut of future rents (a promise that would be reneged on, the first of many) she hoodwinked the builders into carrying out the tasks technically for free, thus pocketing the advance payments made by the future tenants. When the property was ready, she offered prospective tenants the chance to outbid the previous ones and the latter were left with no abode, despite having paid for the renovations. She told Enrico, ‘life’s most important lesson is that you and yours come first.’ With that her errant children returned to the fray to oversee the empire that was opening up before them.

 

            Enrico was different to the rest of them. In an academic sense, I mean. He was equally determined and avaricious in his pursuit of financial reward, and wasted no time dominating the school playground’s black market. Gosh, we were innocent. He ran rings round all of us. He had the older kids as hired goons and wannabe cohorts stealing from their parents to finance his stock. No outlay, no investment, just gall. I hated being impressed. When we expelled him it made no difference, he still ran things, either from inside or outside the school gates.

 

            By 14, I could see that I had before me a brain that is rarely seen in places such as these. He soon became enamoured with law and business studies. The latter particularly, he garnered an interest in stocks and shares whilst most people in the town had yet to open a bank account. He studiously monitored German and US firms aiming to predict when their stock would rise and be able to sell for a profit. He falsified documentation to be able to trade in stocks at the age of fifteen and made his first killing less than a fortnight later, options purchased with money fronted by other investors, who, after his commission was taken, would see a somewhat disappointing return on their investment.

           

            He was earning at sixteen what brokers in Milan and abroad were struggling to reach in their forties. Soon people came from the cities to him for financial advice. The money he made was reinvested in his mother’s property business and soon the latter would control the town, holding a penchant for run down areas that could be taken advantage of.

 

            Yet despite this upturn in fortunes, Enrico still had a preoccupation. He told me ‘I don’t want people to think of me like the others in my family. I know I am different, I have to help them because they were there for me, but now things are different. I want to study, I want to go to university, I want people to know that I am different. Can you help me?’ How could I say no? The thing was, he could have walked the exams without my help, but I like to think that he enjoyed what you might call learned company. He spent his time with physical and financial bullies, he knew what he had to study, but not why he should study it.

 

            We became close as I tutored him. I took no money from the classes, and he stopped the gifts when I made it clear that I wanted nothing from his ill-gotten gains (in those days I mistrusted the workings of the stock exchange through ignorance, now I know I was in the right.), that inspired him to enter a creative writing competition, which he won, of course, and with those winnings, he bought me a painting that still hangs on my living room wall to this day.

 

            At that time, his motivation seemed equally to be focused on success and not being seen as part of the scumbag family of ‘mafiosi’ who basically had the run of the town. He was convinced of the intellectual nature of his calling, his being drawn to the arts. He promised that he would return to the plume in later years, but first he had to make his fortune, and for that he needed a law degree.

 

            His mother was similarly delighted with the idea of her son becoming a lawyer, she knew he would be a good one and that would give her a certain amount of immunity. She prepared herself to step up control of the town for the moment when Enrico would give all of her actions carte blanche.

 

            I genuinely believe that was the happiest Enrico ever found himself in his life, maybe with time he will find some sort of redemption or atonement, but it is difficult to return after such a disgrace. [1]He was determined to get into Milan’s Law Faculty with the highest grades in the university entrance exams. He toiled day and night as we studied the syllabus together, he wanted me with him in that journey, though if I am honest, I learnt more than him in those sessions, I think he knew some of the stuff was beyond me, I was a jack-of-all-trades in that sixties educational environment, and as the seventies appeared, the man who had trained as primary school teacher forced to impart knowledge to half-hearted country dwellers had amassed a knowledge that would never be called upon again. Before I mentioned his happiness at the time, I overlooked my own.

 

            It was the professional highlight of my career. Since then I have been chasing the next diamond, overturning stones in the country only to be disappointed when any buffeting results in further misshapen stones. Most people in my trade never get this once, but ifyou do, you want it twice, it’s human nature.

 

            Everyone knew what was going on with the family, this was Italy, after all. Life got easier in the seventies, but many still depended on the Fettuccini’s benevolence. The problem with being a benefactor of such graciousness was that you would be expected to return the favour at some point, normally with interest rates not found in your local bank. Enrico made sure that I was beyond reproach, I could have made money out of him, but, even though it sounds unbelievable now, what I got from being able to teach him something, more than made up for a new car, a colour TV or a better fridge. At the end of the day, I can say that I knew the boy before he became the monster, that in reality he was never a monster, but circumstances drove him to act in the way he did. You could say that about virtually anyone, though.

 

            As the time approached for his university exams, he dedicated less and less time to his work (of course, he was trading on his own with a false licence or on behalf of people who were supposed experts in the field). He took risks, cut corners and lost money, he tried to make a couple of quick deals that would yield more than he normally made in three or four, so that he would have extra time to study. These deals turned sour and he lost face. What was admirable at the time was his ability to accept these knocks as part of a learning curve.

 

            He never made the same mistake twice but made sure he made each one once. That was how he learned. That is how he got better. I drove him to take the exams. I doubt his mother actually knew what he had to do. If the enrolment had been up to her, he would never have even got a pencil. He had moved out into an apartment. He was dating a 23-year-old lawyer who was giving him pointers. He was half-way through the reading list for the second year of the degree course before finishing his exams. Inevitably, his papers did not just receive the highest marks possible, they were published by the education department and given a distinction. Milan University were delighted to offer him a place. He now needed an older, more experienced lawyer as a cohort.

 

            Despite him leaving the town, we remained in contact. He wrote to me almost every week, maintaining more contact with me than with his family. He seemed to outgrow them as he saw more and more of the city. From that base, he travelled to other parts of Italy and abroad, learning English and German with the same effortless ease that had characterised all of his previous studies. Inevitably, the frequency of the letters dropped, by the time he entered his second year of studies, information was filtered down to me second-hand, then there was a card at Christmas, then a photo when he graduated.

 

            I knew he had been taken on by a major Milan firm whilst still a mere undergraduate. He was not there just to help with the office chores and bring the coffee, either. He was doing everything bar appearing in court and donning the wig, because he couldn’t, yet. But cases were won thanks to him and his reputation was being grounded.

 

            I thought I heard the last from him, not of him, when I received a phone call in 1973. He would have been on his way to his final exams. In those days, you could plough through the materials at the pace you wanted, technically doing a five-year degree-course in just over three if you were good enough. He was, despite the fact he was also working. But he was seeing the reality of life as a lawyer. He was seeing that it wasn’t the life he wanted. Even if he was the best, he would be comfortable defending high-flying businessmen whose luxury outstripped anything he could aspire to even as partner of the firm. He had left his trading prowess to one side for too long, and it was time re-join the party.

 

            He was despondent when he called me. ‘I want to jack it all in. There is no point in me finishing this degree. I hate Law and I hate the idea of being a lawyer. I have already seen where this profession is going. It’s pointless. I’ll just start up on my own as a trader.’ He told me. I made sure he knew he had to finish, it made no sense to leave it there. Especially when it would involve no effort for him. He eventually saw reason, and acquiesced, even with his reduced interest still obtaining the highest grades in recent times. He then accepted his degree and left the firm.

 

            He offered me a job, but I refused. My work is here I told him. He offered to buy me a new house, but I told him that if I were to move, it would be because I could afford to. I feel at times that he respected me and despised me equally because I was one of the few people who he couldn’t buy, one of the few who stayed fast to their beliefs whilst other sycophants gave him the responses he wanted. I knew my approval was important to him. The next phone call I received would be requesting my pardon when he got caught, but there would be a lot of water going under the bridge between that point and then.

 

            From hereon in, all I can tell you about him is less than many others can tell you. He only returned to the town for his mother’s funeral. He came to see me, but things had changed so much by then that the relationship was not the same. I still saw the boy in the trembled in my classroom all those years before, but he had become an imposing man ready to take on the world.

 

            The camera continued, and Di Marco sipped from his coffee, only when he looked up and directly to shot could we see the glimmer of moisture in his eyes. It was the first time he had shown any emotion during the entire interview, remaining stoically unchanged throughout, now he had finished, and his memory allowed him a slight dalliance with sentimentality. He moves over to the table and takes a bite of the apple, with that he gives a wink to the camera and the fuzzy lines appear once more.

 

Once again, we see the presenter with a serious look all over her face. “We’d like to thank the Di Marco family for allowing us to use his recordings. As you may know, the teacher passed away in 2004 after a short illness and Fettuccini was allowed to attend his schoolmaster’s farewell on compassionate grounds whilst serving at the pleasure of the Republic.

 

“The next guest is the lady who worked as his personal assistant and confidant from January 1981 until his first incarceration in 2002. She has only just retired from her legal aid post at the age of seventy-five and plans to write her memoirs now that she has the time. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Orsola Ciardi.”

 

There is applause and the sprightly lady takes her seat. She looks well for seventy-five.

 

Maestro Di Marco gave an account of the life of Fettuccini in his formative years, just until he completed his law degree and decided not to practice. Of course, you were still at school when all this was happening and would not meet Fettuccini until seven years later, in 1981 when he surprisingly took you on as his personal assistant. I hope you will permit the use of the term surprising as you were younger than any of the other candidates and had relatively little experience. What did you know about him before you had the interview?

 

I did my homework, but it is not like nowadays. You had to traipse through libraries and old newspapers to find out more about people in those days. He was young and ambitious, but so was I. I was sure that if he got to see me than he would see my potential. I felt we were very similar in many respects. I got the sensation he felt the same and that is why he hired me. He had a reputation for, shall we say, extra-curricular activities even at that stage, I knew what to expect but it seemed clear from the outset that I was not his type. That was perhaps my blessing, or my downfall. Depends how you look at it. When I left that interview, I did not expect twenty years later to be behind bars.” She began.

 

“Was he clear about his plans even then? How much were you aware of at the start?” The interviewer put on her probing suit.

 

I maintain that pretty much everything back then was above board. He had an eye for business and was charming. Fettuccini Inc. was going places, but it seemed to lack direction, stewardship and vision. He was still not sure what his calling was, or how to prove himself outside the legal sphere. He was wealthy at twenty-nine, he probably could have even retired then, or had someone else do the work and cash in the chips, I know plenty who would have taken that option, but Enrico was not built for leisure. He could never switch off. He gave all he had and expected the same in return. He was generous, but could be a very tough-task master.

 

            But he was not despotic, he did not fire people for saying the wrong things, but he was very reluctant to hire anyone he had doubts about. He used to wander the streets at night, rough areas in Milan, around the Romolo and Lodi districts, looking for inspiration. I am surprised he did not get into more trouble than he did. A couple of times he came back grazed but only ever carried a single ten-thousand lira note and no wallet or ID.

 

            These parts of the city reminded him of the squalor he had seen in his hometown and began to lead him to believe that his mission may have more of a political calling than entrepreneurial. He was struck by the way these areas ruled themselves, policing being almost a token gesture. From the City Hall down, the feeling was that these were not areas that could be saved, so tourists and well-to-do citizens were wise not to venture into these areas. The problems arose when their residents shifted their offices to the places where tourists did go and where the city’s wealth could be troubled. But he was still a long way from coming up with his famous first idea.

 

            He continued to dabble in the stock market, but that was boring him, just like Law. It was easy, he could tell which companies would break through and which stock to buy. Those deals financed a leisure and hotel complex that kept him entertained, but once it was built, his interest waned. Even as the profits rolled in, he was anxious for another venture to occupy his mind. A new venture, always, he would never repeat.

 

            Delinquency seems to run in the blood around these parts and inspiration can come from the strangest of places. One day, on a visit to a prison outside Turin, Fettuccini was struck by the overwhelming mixture of inefficiency and the obvious levels of corruption that were inherent within the place. He was not particularly angered by the corruption itself, moreover that so little was being done to channel the potential benefits of this flagrant misuse of power. He sat down with the governor and demanded an explanation as to the nature of the set-up.

 

            He was disgusted. He put his team in the Milan office to work on a reform of the Italian prison system. He began to curry favour with people in power to devise a model prison that would work for the state. He argued that the majority of the prisoners inside would not respond to any treatment aimed at reinserting them back into society would be a mere squandering of public money. Why not let them carry on with their business though in a fully taxed model that would allow the state to recover some of its outlay, ideally all and more.

 

            The plans almost harked back to his mother’s days in the homestead, lots of promises based on flimsy future rewards and lots of commitments that would never be undertaken. Even so, with enough political backing behind him, he was able to unveil plans for a model prison outside Milan in Chiari, in August 1986, whilst most of the opposition enjoyed its summer holiday period.

 

            The plan was simple. The prison would no longer be a state-funded venture. It would be given a budget every year and that money would be distributed between the employees and inmates. The system would govern itself to maintain order, in theory, or those who could not be trusted to maintain said order, would fall victims of the same. In any jail, there is a hidden infrastructure in place that abuses the justice measures intended to convert hardened, or hardening, criminals, so Fettuccini argued that would it not be vastly beneficial to the Italian state to have these people in control of mini-ghettos where they would be happy and fulfilled rather than being forced back on society to wreak havoc once more. Those who were willing to redeem themselves would have the opportunity. If education was required, there would be more money, relatively, to aid people who had made the decision to better themselves.” She paused.

 

“You will have to admit that it sounds, to the untrained ear, that you were basically implementing semi-regulated concentration camps.” The reporter asked.

 

Enrico was so much better than me at making it sound plausible. He believed in it, so we all did. It was a vote winner. There was no way of seeing then where things would go. You give the inmates a certain amount of responsibility and spice that up with a modicum of fear, you seem to have a perfect recipe for success. The problem is that you are expecting rational behaviour from criminals. In many ways, though, giving people power who have never held power before is a dangerous element in any scenario. Despite good intentions, people often have trouble handling this new situation.” She tried to smile at the camera.

 

“So, what was life like in Chiari in the first years?”

 

To the outside world, the project was a resounding success. Crime rates fell in Milan as people actually wanted to stay there once their stretch was up. There they could make a name for themselves and move up the ladder, back on the streets it was quite different. The professional staff were technically in charge, but things happened. At the start, it was easy to brush all these minor hiccups under the carpet, but the prison population was dwindling and there was no new intake. Old scores were being settled and the real control was in the hands of the convicts. Chiari was an out-of-control den of iniquity in no time, but the government needed it to be seen as a success. There were plans for the model prison system to be extended all over Italy, and system licenced abroad. International observers were invited to audit the installations. We were told that all of this was new, and that we would need some time for readjustment.

 

            No real information left Chiari at the time of the audits. Both sides were happy to report that the happy prisoners they saw in the workshops and classrooms were the product of a convivial ambience that had changed their outlook. Once the cameras were turned off, drug running, extortion and prostitution became the watchwords of the Chiari set-up. But Fettuccini was in negotiations with Rome and had lucrative deals in place that would clean up the capital. This motivated him more than anything else, because it was not just the wealth, soon he would be taking a cut from each of the model prisons opened during his tenure, but also from every gram of drug sold, from every clandestine clinch and every fearful loner forced to pay for protection. The belief that he was doing good never left him. He knew that he had to do bad to do good. That was his justification, the system could not be saved, but as a patriot, there was no way that Italy should have to bear the cost.

 

            As expansions were planned for Rome, it was election year and seven model prisons promised to transform the capital and rid it of delinquency, things people wanted to hear, things others did not have the guts to say, along with Naples and Palermo, minor issues such as a number of deceased prisoners could not be allowed to hinder progress. There were times when it could have been argued that the system worked. I won’t say that it had its advantages because that is patently obvious, and the reason it took the best part of twenty years to close them down. It was free money for the state, it was beyond Orwell, self-contained hell-holes that were financially productive. In five years, the prison system had gone from being a burden on the taxpayer to being self-sufficient, and in many cases, profitable. Mafia techniques, know-how and staff were brought in to streamline less efficient prisons, but by 1993, not one model prison cost the Italian state a single lira.

 

            That is why it was so easy to turn a blind eye. These were criminal elements either killing themselves or being allowed to run their own kingdoms. People outside were not bothered, criminals did not need to pilfer from the streets when they could arrange an interview and join the programme.

 

            The lands around Chiari were appropriated to allow for the expansion of the prison and the fledgling industries that it housed. Entire families were relocated and formed part of prison life, with no restriction on visiting as long as targets were met. The governor remained in place, along with his staff, but their presence bore more testament to tokenism, as they would be unable to quell any uprising. Though that was the beauty of the system, while it worked, there would be no uprising as such, the prisoners did not want to leave, all there would be were power struggles, and if whoever was in power was too foolish to keep it, then a sort of natural order would take control until there was balance once again. All the criminals wanted was a place run and a chance to live in better conditions. You have to wonder about whether the idea was actually that wrong, maybe just the way it was implemented.

 

            Anyway, before we knew it, the Rome tender was up for grabs and we were interviewing new staff. Central government made it clear that Rome was to be a success and efforts should be focused there, but that resources were not to be taken from Rome to solve problems in Naples and Palermo. They would sort themselves out. It had always been the way down there.

 

Anyway, before we knew it, the Rome tender was up for grabs and we were interviewing new staff. Central government made it clear that Rome was to be a success and efforts should be focused there, but that resources were not to be taken from Rome to solve problems in Naples and Palermo. They would sort themselves out. It had always been the way down there.  The onus was on getting Rome right, that would mean international tenders and serious money.

 

            By now, Fettuccini had more money than he could obviously spend, though try he did, yet it was never enough. The lure of the lira, so to speak, had overpowered him. He associated more money with more power. And inevitably, in a system based on the corrupt operations of criminals and politicians, when the cracks began to appear, they were impossible to fill.

 

            Rome worked perfectly, they all did, on the surface. The reality was a series of self-contained crime cities that were left to their own devices, as long as they did not bother the clean and safe cities that the country now boasted. First there were the infiltrations, the Internet’s burgeoning powers gave the world a platform to share its views, for good or for bad. In the mid-nineties, most of the voices raising the issue of the model prisons were reasonably level-headed. Around the prisons, people knew what was really going on, maybe no-one really fell for the glossy promotional videos that showed happy inmates co-habiting in peaceful existence, it was as believable as the stuff the Nazis and the Soviets put out in black and white, but as everyone was doing so well out of it, why would anyone interfere?

 

            People looked at it like this, the system was working, that was undeniable. How could anyone question it? GDP was up, spending on policing, prisons and security in general was vastly reduced. Most prisons actually made money, of course, it was alleged that this was returned to the public coffers, but in reality, well, we all know what really happened. While everyone was happy with their share, things moved along swimmingly. That said, life expectancy for new inmates in Naples was five months, by 1997 there was actually a shortage of criminals in the region. Heads of the prison even had to interview from other parts of Italy to cover posts.

 

            And then the trouble really started. The governors, boards of directors and staff knew they were there for show, precariously poised and in danger of being removed at any moment. They were told they had the backing of the military but push and shove joining forces, as they so often do, the latter did not inspire much confidence as the inmates were now much more expertly armed. Hostages were taken in one of the Rome prisons. The cons demanded a much bigger cut, or they would execute the staff. It was a mess. International observers came in and ordered the Italian government to find a solution. The decision was made to create the scenario of a long-running standoff between the military and those inside the prisons, but the reality was the government just planned a kind of war of attrition in the hope that everyone would kill everyone else and just require a clean-up afterwards.

 

            Some prisons even had their own broadcasting equipment and proudly showed the world what was going on. The Italian government was disgraced and needed a scapegoat. It was obvious that nobody in the highest echelons was going to take the rap and Fettuccini was put on the stand. In the meantime, sanctions meant that any ill-gotten gains during those “glory years” were put to use undoing the wrong that had been done. The goose that laid the golden eggs had been abused, raped, eaten, exhumed, cooked again and its bones boiled down for soup. Everyone wanted a piece, and everyone took one, until the system collapsed. I genuinely believe, and will always believe, that a controlled model prison system could work. The fulcrum is, clearly, to what extent control should be implemented.” She smiled at the camera.

 

The first versions of the model prisons were closed in 1999, with Fettuccini and his team facing trial in the spring of 2000 as the perpetrators of the failed system. You worked closely with him during this period, and the man’s reputation proceeds him, but was he really as tough and heartless as the press made out?

 

He was a perfectionist above all. I think people have an idea of him that they have imagined and do not want to shift from that preconception. I consider myself fortunate to have known and worked for him, to have loved him, not in a biblical sense, but I loved him as a friend, as a colleague and as a mentor. People have never believed that at no time did we become romantically involved, but it is the truth. Perhaps if we had done, I would have saved myself a lot of bother and a prison sentence, as it would have been fleeting at best. But no, my ability to remain distant from his advances, not that there were any after the first few months, meant that I was privy to a level of trust few were granted.

 

“Obviously, during your trial, the Fettuccini defence was quick to put a gagging order on both the press and those taking the stand, but now, with the publication of your autobiography around the corner, would you be able to shed some light on what you described as ‘juicy anecdotes’ during your testimony? You have remained silent for more than three decades, but our viewers would certainly enjoy a sneak preview.” The interviewer knew what she was doing.

 

Well, why not? After all fiction in recent years has seemed to struggle to find an outlet for itself, so maybe fact is the future. However, before I begin, I would like to stress that any proceeds from my book will go to funds established to help those thousands of families who lost so much during that dark period, well, the dark period I was involved in, but I don’t want to steal the thunder of your next guest.

 

            People think I knew everything. If I had, if others had, the system would have fallen to pieces before. Yes, people were making a pretty penny out of it, and there was the added bonus that criminals were much happier in the model prisons than on the streets. But all theorem work better on paper, once they are put into practice, the cracks appear and, especially when dealing with a system based on greed to attain power, its durability was always going be hard fought.

 

            There were always two stories. The truth and what was told to the press. I became privy to the truth when it could no longer be hidden from me. We had to believe in the system to make the elements we put in place work, or seem to. Naivety is a major part of success at this level, maybe you prefer not to see a reality, or you assume that as nobody else can see it, there is nothing to see. I was a fervent believer in the project until the turn of the decade, when hitherto unseen carelessness allowed me to obtain a deeper vision of how the project was operating.

 

            I felt stupid for a while when I found out. Then I felt anger as I knew my role would change. I tried to act normal in the meantime, but it was useless. In the end, I found out that it was not carelessness, moreover, it was meant to look like that, but he knew what he was doing. He wanted to see where my loyalty was, whilst making it clear that even if I thought I could use ignorance as a defence, the papers showed my consent had been given. My signature was on the documents, I know I didn’t sign them, but that did not really matter. I was promoted a week later.

 

            Once I was fully ‘au fait’ with what was going on, I began to make plans for my future. I knew prison was around the corner, hopefully the sentences would be reduced, and we would be out sharpish. This was 1992, for the next ten years I expected to be taken away handcuffed at any moment, by the time it happened, it was actually a relief.

 

            I had changed a lot since that innocent young girl walked into the interview. I had become more like him, I guess I wanted to be him, though knew I never could. He saw my potential, that is another thing that saved me, he could never be with a woman whom he saw as being on an equal footing, he was very traditional in that sense. I wasn’t. I won, or so I believed. Anyway, as my new role gave me new powers, I was offered the chance to head one of the secret (then) divisions that were operating inside the prisons.

 

            Given the amount of death that was occurring in the place, I hit upon the idea of taking advantage of those corpses and moribund bodies wasting away or awaiting incineration. Criminals’ livers, kidneys and hearts were no different from any other normal, healthy person, yet vastly different to wealthy people on medical waiting lists for transplants. It began almost by accident, we hadn’t really explored that niche in the market, we were too busy trying to exploit them while they were alive to think about their worth once they had departed. A friend of a friend mentioned that his daughter needed a kidney transplant or would not finish high-school. This friend had the resources but not the donor, none of her family would make suitable donors, we offered to screen one.

 

            As the first case was a mere kidney, once we found a suitable donor a deal was made with him for one of his and a lump sum. That was not particularly ethical but compared to the other stuff this was like taping an album at home. The doctors involved drew up a list of wealthy patients who could benefit from the availability of suitable organs and we began a more serious screening process. Certain donors befell accidents when it was clear that their organs could serve a better purpose. Others we got lucky with as they died of what the prison services referred to as “natural causes”, have you ever seen a place where so many men in their twenties and thirties die of natural causes? Whenever the families kicked up a fuss, they were easily paid off or threatened, they knew everyone on the inside was part of a gang, it was the life they had chosen, often the families on the outside accepted the price of their newfound lifestyle being the loss of the occasional member, collateral damage, isn’t that what they call it.

 

            I had the idea of turning this into an export business, so that when the inevitable international police appeared, we would have some more leverage as big names were involved. We started small time, but demand was huge, and ethics overlooked. Some clients we did not charge, it was more important to have a lobbying voice in their parliaments. That was how we got a foothold into the US Senate, the Bundestag and the ‘Gosudárstvennaya Dúma’. Maybe it was this venture what prevented us from being taken down for so long, that would be heaping praise on myself that is perhaps undue.

 

            Either way, before those involved really understood how serious their foul play was, they were in it as much as us, who was going to bring us down now? And who would fall with us? It was a time in which everything was for sale. There was a recession in Europe, outwardly, but only felt by those who toiled at their machines, offices and desks, those behind the system felt like everything was there for the taking and we tried to take the lot.

 

            One out of every five operations I channelled off for my retirement, forced or earned. At first, it hurt me when kids’ organs were used, as far as I know, no child was ever killed to order, but the fact that I don’t know, does not mean that it didn’t happen. When I was released from prison in 2010, a large part of my wealth was intact and waiting for me on a Caribbean island. I missed Italy, but had to keep out of the public eye. Bribes and the fact that people have such short memories helped me. Then, when the time was right, I made an immunity deal and released the remainder of the documents that they never got their hands on. Some of the biggest firms in the world are about to be exposed, you will soon see how the people you have voted for and supported for the last twenty or thirty years have hands as dirty as mine and Enrico’s.

 

            There, you have your scoop. Happy now?” Orsola finished. The camera returned to the presenter whose mouth remained open. Broadcasters had seen a lot over the years, but this represented television history. The cameraman, unsure of how to react either, changed the focus to the studio audience, who replicated the expression on the presenter’s face. After a pause, she muttered the words “Ad break”.

 

Orsola left the studio floor without assistance and was taken by limousine to her next port of call. Her deal would be enough to see her out of jail for the rest of her life, though she had taken the decision to accept the ignominy of the general public’s resentment of her actions as punishment. She did not expect to last very long as she headed to the airport to take her private jet.

 

The presenter, now professionally composed and ready for the next guest, hair neatly coiffured and make-up retouched, return to TV robot mode for the next segment.

 

“Well, that was quite a revelation. I just hope the rest of the show doesn’t let you down!” She joked but inside was petrified at how they were going to follow THAT. “As promised, our next guest is Fettuccini’s second wife Nilde Boschi, who will be reading extracts from her 2029 autobiography ‘The Woman Behind the Man’. She promises to offer a privileged insight into thestory behind Fettuccini’s second and final phase in power.  The renowned socialite and party-girl, twenty-five years his junior and, if you believe the gossip columns (she turns to another camera and grins ‘it’s all lies’!) largely liable for his heart attack in 2020. In her first public appearance in nearly ten years, ladies and gentlemen, show your appreciation for Nilde Boschi!”

 

There was no appreciation, a chorus of boos rang out from a group of loyal supporters who still blamed her as much as they blamed him. “Nilde is going to share with us a series of hitherto unseen extracts from her autobiography, published in 2029, which were deemed even too salacious for the Italian public. These delve deeper into the pair’s complex relationship, and her involvement in Fettuccini’s green revolution that would see him released from jail and once again moving amongst the elite in Italian and European politics. Let’s give her the chance to tell her side of the story, remember some of you viewed Orsola as just another victim in this story before the show started, maybe you will see Nilde in a different light afterwards. So, Nilde, for the uninitiated, please explain a little more about the “Green Revolution”.

 

Well, once Enrico was in jail, there was little he could do. He had friends on the outside, that was true, but he was the high-profile scapegoat to the biggest scandal in recent history, maybe even the biggest scandal ever, he had to do what they called proper time. Every eye was on him, of course, he could not be in the company of other prisoners or he would have lasted five minutes. He was taken to a specially built compound that was created for him, Orsola and others at the top of the chain. There were voices that wanted him (them) to be thrown to the wolves, some of the wishy-washy liberals who made sure the model prisons ended the way they did, suddenly ceased to be the bastions of liberty and lovers of life as they bade for his blood. Funny how ideals are so easily changed, that was what Enrico tried to tell everyone all the time. Anyway, my reading will begin, as a response to your question, with the idea of the Green Revolution.

 

            I believe it did start off as an epiphany. He wanted to make amends. He was repentant. I also believe his initial dream for the model prisons was not what it became years later. He was a good man, deep down, very deep down, obviously, you had to seek it out, and by the time I got to him, a lot of the early stuff had already happened. The first wife took a lot out of him, but I owe her, she gave him the kids, so I didn’t have to. I have never liked them and the idea of bearing them has always been an anathema to me, by the time the country bumpkin managed to get the overdose right, they were away at boarding school and I could call in the decorators to begin to eradicate all semblance of her poor taste .  

 

            He had been in prison for four and a half years when the idea came to him. He saw how much waste there was, even from that privileged position, he could see that. Whether he would have had the same inkling to save the world from inside one of his own model prisons is another matter. He was determined to get another chance. He went down because he took the rap, I mean, it was actually his idea and fault, and because of his actions lots of people died, industries and political careers were destroyed, and Italy was a laughing stock, once more, but he did feel he had paid his dues. He promised me he would be out soon, so I stuck by him. We were supposed to have had our wealth curtailed but life was still comfortable. I didn’t work nor did I need to. I did the odd interview but said nothing of any worth. I kept the good stuff for later. For now, you might say.

 

            I met him in 1994. He was still married then, obviously, but that had never bothered him (or her) before so there was no point in it starting now. You all heard her side of the story regarding that bit, so I’ll stick with my remit: ‘The Green Revolution: Unpublished Excerpt 1:’

 

            As I said, during one of my visits, we talked about how disgusted he was with his research into waste and people’s failure to adopt more green lifestyles. He was allowed to use monitored internet in prison and began writing a sort of “Green Mein Kampf”, outlining his views on how to save the planet. Most of it was a hotchpotch of current de vogue environmentalists’ ideas. I don’t really think there was anything new that he was saying, but he managed to make anything come across is believable. We devised our own language when awaiting sentencing, practicing it for months on end so that we would be able to communicate more or less freely once inside. It was not rocket science, but it certainly had them stumped for a while, it was not easy to master and quite often neither of us had much of an idea what the other one was saying. You simply replaced the second to last vowel with the next one in the alphabet, and did the same with the penultimate consonant, though this time changing the consonant for the one preceding it in the alphabet. We only did this with verbs and nouns so that most of the conversation would be in standard Italian, this had the effect of making it more confusing to the listener, as soon as they thought they had latched on to something, another word came along to throw them off the scent. So in the sentence “we are going to break you out of jail”, you would have “we ere goolg to breej you out of jaok”. Most of the time we would muffle the jumbled words to account for getting things wrong, which sometimes actually helped or made it equally difficult to understand.

 

            What made it even easier for us was the fact that he was passing false information to his new PA, and Orsola’s successor, Patrizia, this was done without her knowledge, but then again, so were most things. Why would a disgraced businessman in prison need a PA still? She just took the salary and didn’t ask. The information she had was then scrutinised by the police and other forces of law and order, which left us free to discuss plans for this ‘Green Revolution’ of his.

 

            It was clearly a ruse to get out early. He sold the redemption card, his atonement would be the pardon of all of Italy. He had done the nation wrong, but now had the means to put things right. Ecology would teach us how to live as a more functional and still more decent society. He was committed to this idea at the time, maybe he was later, I asked him in code whether there was something else behind it, but he insisted I begin to implement his work before his release.

 

            Release? What planet was he living on? He had been sentenced to eighty years and served four. He was going nowhere as far as I could see, but he had been given permission to use ‘undisclosed funds’ to form a scientific association to further research and implement a seven-step procedure for manufacturing firms to implement. On paper, it looked like a delightful means of changing our ways. We made progress, appointing scientists and managers using cash that had been absconded from the model prison days. Why was no-one questioning his motives and allowing him to act? Our next meeting would clarify a great deal.

 

            ‘I hose lots of ondo on the peuqle that pos me here. I hose mece a barfein with the polode. If I keon quios I woml be fsoe.’ So that was it. He had been bargaining a deal that would set him free and allow him to return to Italian society, more than just a free man, but head of the Green Revolution.  In the last two years of the model prison system, he did nothing more than amass evidence that would one day set him free. He knew that he could not use it during the trial but needed to wait until the people he had taken the rap for would be once again cosily ensconced in the luxury of their careers. Now he was ready to attack. Suddenly, it was declared that there had been evidence tampered with during the trial, a technicality, that did not mean that he was innocent, only that the justice system had failed to uphold the principles it claimed so dear to it during the media circus.

 

            In weeks they were all out. For a while, there was talk of a re-trial but that was just to give his legal counsel time to put together a binding argument as to why that was wholly inadmissible. And so he reappeared, showing the customary repent, looking almost forlorn, claiming he would not squander this second chance and sharing his vision of how to make Italy great in the eyes of the world again. It seemed to wholly unbelievable and see-through that it did not surprise me how quickly people took to it. He began giving lectures that soon turned into rallies, he began to appear ready for office once more. Nobody even questioned it, people actually seemed thankful he was back.

 

            The idea was simply to force companies to operate within guidelines set forth in accordance with things like the Kyoto Protocol or whichever agreement was in vogue at the time and wholly open to loose interpretation. His genuine motivation soon gave way to his old chum averice, not solely due to the accumulation of wealth, but more the enjoyment he got from once again seeing people vie for his attention. Within months, some of the major manufacturing firms in Italy could see their production halted at any time on his say-so. That is what he loved. Once you have seen everything money can give you, you need something else, an extra. For him it was power. Yet power is a difficult drug of choice, and tends to betray those who taste its wares.

 

            So that is how he went from someone who had just left prision to Minister of Finance in less than five years. He made sure that everyone owed him a favour to remain operational. Basically, our office would issue a certificate saying that whichever firm was licenced to trade in the (insert product). This did not mean that Italy was suddenly a green country and a model to aspire to. Once the certificates had been issued, insepctions were laughingly undertaken that meant an extension of the original terms. As Enrico was not solely motivated by money now, the firms had to find a way to attract his attention, and keep it. Once they had it, they could do as they pleased.

 

            This scheme had an effect on their profits and this meant that many manufacturers saw the need to cut corners with the cheaper versions of their products. The more power he got, the higher up the ladder he moved. When he was made Minister, it was reminiscent of when Hitler was given the chancellorship (it’s a fierce comparison, I know, but it’s not easy finding a benchmark worse the Enrico, and when I say Enrico, I include everyone in his inner circle.

 

            This went on for years unchallenged. Companies registered, were certified, passed their inspections or failed them. At first, many companies did actually legitimately pass their inspections, or would have done, had they ever been performed. I almost felt sorry for manufacturers of chemical products who implemented a series of measures to be compliant with the standards in force, when it was just the fact that their CEO was on a lobbying committee that could propel Enrico even higher into the political sky.

 

            His shift into the government happened after his first heart attack in 2020. The press were beginning to do their old investigative journalism trick, poking their noses in, smelling a rat, like their profession is in any way honourable. We had in place a series of scapegoats and false information, also the joyous aspect of working in an ambience decorated with greed and ambition, is that we had people who held executive posts yet did nothing, just waiting to take the rap when it all came crashing down around us. They were prepared to do ten or fifteen years in a former model prison (part of the plea bargain) so that Enrico could be exonerated. I trusted him but that was naivety. If he had to save himself, then he would.

 

            People say I caused his first heart attack. That’s true to an extent. We were married in 2019, but with a pre-nup longer than a Ken Follett novel. There was no way he was going to lose his fortune for folly such as love. He did love me, and I him, but he loved other things more. With the press sniffing around, I suggested some outpouring of public pity might help his cause. Hence a rather bad case of indigestion (I forced him to eat three steaks in twenty minutes) led to an ambulance being called. His private physician then declared he had a myocardial infarction. People came in droves to the hospital, well-wishers, admirers, even enemies. I have never seen anyone have such a hold on the people.

 

            Less than two weeks later, there were pictures of him in the gym, proudly consuming wholly safe products (the liquids were Evian water with harmless colourant) and promising to come back fitter and stronger. The next day, he was offered the post of Minister, he hadn’t been an MP but there would be a by-election, the President needed people like him. Once they finally left us in peace, I laughed harder than I had ever done in my life. Now, it seemed he would be untouchable.

 

            For the four years he was Minister, the Green Revolution was more or less left to its own devices. Occasionally, there was an in-house orchestrated purge, a tip-off and one of the execs bade farewell to their life of leisure to shift to an incarcerated life of leisure. That way, it looked like we were on top of things, but of course, the official line was, you had to bear in mind that Enrico could not be in two places at once, the demands on the Minister were immense, of course he had to delegate, and that can sometimes bring issues with it. We referred constantly to the unblemished reputation prior to him joining the Government. Yet he promised to sort the wheat from the chaff within his own staff.

 

            Then, in 2024, kids started dying. First just one. These things happen. Press statement and move on. Then more. It turned out that so many corners were being cut by certified green companies that almost no quality controls were being exercised on perishable goods. One of the major suppliers of powdered milk for infants was reusing materials past their prime, well past their prime, and then others that had no place in any foodstuff. By the end a tin of powdered milk costing ten euros had production costs of less than ninety centimes. A quick profit indeed.

 

            That brought the Government down. The President resigned claiming he needed to spend more time with his family. He jumped before he was pushed. The others were pushed. Before the health authorities could get a handle on the situation, eighty-seven children had died and a further three-hundred and sixty-two were hospitalised, only seventeen of these ever coming out alive, and only two making it to adulthood. Of course, none of this is new information to you, so I will end with something that has rested on my editor’s floor for a while. I’m not sure how often an editor’s face turns white when they read something, but I thank him for his generosity in keeping this out of the public eye until now.

 

            Two years before the first death, a friend of mine had a baby and we went to see them. She wanted to breastfeed but couldn’t. The child looked awful, I asked her if she was alright (the child) and the mother said that since they had changed milk brands (following a very persuasive advertising campaign) the child had been listless. I left and made enquiries. The next day I told her not to use that brand ever again and gave her a list of approved suppliers (in reality those we had not certified). The child got better, and I tackled Enrico on the matter.

 

            He told me not to meddle. If people were going to buy cheap milk instead of looking out for their children’s welfare, then they deserved what they got for cutting corners. I couldn’t believe the hypocrisy and told him so. He hit me there and then and told me to shut my mouth. One more word and he would have me killed, wife or no wife. So, my quandary was to become a whistle-blower or hope everything would blow over. I didn’t have the guts to bring him down, not out of love and admiration, but because I was scared of what would happen to me.

 

            Once the deaths started to mount up, the false executives wanted to jump ship. That led to a series of unfortunate accidents that I was, unknowingly, involved in. False evidence was planted, of course I would say that, that implicated me. I knew I was finished, yet failed to move. It was Enrico who made the first move. He didn’t want to go to prison as a child murderer and cut a deal with the Public Prosecutor to accept liability for serious financial irregularities, accepting a fifteen-year sentence before the true culprits of the children’s deaths could be unveiled. Part of the deal was that he accepted this sentence on the condition that no future charges could be brought upon him for anything related to his part in the Green Revolution. The authorities thought that they had the scoop of the century, but Enrico had got away with murder, again.

 

            Our marriage ended that day, technically. He phoned me from the police station to inform me. He suggested I ran. I stayed. Three days later I was arrested as an accessory to murder. His parting gift to me was to make it look like I had become enraged upon finding out about the milk scandal and organised the deaths of two of its perpetrators. He told me I would look like a heroine, one last gesture to save our family from disgrace. I got forty years and today is the first time I have been allowed out of jail. Once I finish here, I will return there, but as I have a fondness for stealing the show, I will leave you with my true gift to all those mothers and fathers who lost their children, to all those others we can never prove who lost loved ones or who suffered as a result of our greed. Would you allow me a moment’s refreshment?” She stopped and extracted a small flask from her inside pocket. Before the show’s producers could even question whether this was a good idea, she swallowed the contents.

 

“What I have just imbibed is a concentrated version of the milk that killed all of those children, equivalent to six-hundred doses. My physician informs me that this is triple the amount I would need to end this charade, but I like to be sure. This is not a means of repentance, not a trick to extract sympathies, simply what I deserve. I do not know how long it will take to act, I assume I will be escorted off-screen now (the security staff were in the wings waiting to enter but the producer held them off) to die in some corner, overlooked in death as I was in life, the little woman, the bitter old trout who sapped everything she could out of those around her (as she spluttered the last word out, a foamy discharge began to appear in her mouth) Was it worth it? I don’t even know more, I don’t even know if I would do it differently if I had my time again (there was now a trickle of blood coming from the side of her mouth) I guess that’s the problem with money and power, you never have enough, you always want more (she started convulsing and slid off the chair, the camera shifted quickly to the presenter who failed to speak. She was replaced by the Italian broadcaster’s logo, then twenty seconds later, with adverts).

 

When the images appeared again, there was a different presenter. This time a man brandishing a fake smile, genuinely lost for words despite being recruited for his vast collection of them. He mumbled something about the next guest, but the show had the feel of a village fête trying to organise a raffle. Wisely, they cut to music.

 

Some of the studio audience had to be taken for assistance and others left in disgust. When there was finally some semblance of normality, the newly coiffured host flashed his teeth at the camera.

 

“Well, we did promise you the show to end all shows. I feel sorry for our final guest having to top that!” It was a nervous laugh that seemed far from convincing. He was playing it by ear, and the whole world could tell. “By satellite, please welcome Enrico Fettuccini’s cellmate and confidant, Nicola Roccatagliata.” He managed to say.

 

The screen showed an old man in his prison cell with a photo of Enrico behind him. It is a tacky staging that gives the impression that they expect they show has peaked. Nicola is in his early sixties, much younger than Enrico and still in good shape. He smiles at the camera and is asked to provide his memories of Fettuccini’s final years.

 

The prisoners in this wing are not what you would call normal prisoners, we all cut deals, honestly, I have done time before and this does not compare. Enrico asked for me. He could have had the cell to himself, indeed, he could have had a wing to himself, but he was down when he arrived. He might have been, for the first time in his life, aware of what he had done. I don’t want to say repentant, because that came later.

 

            Despite our prison being different, particularly to those HE founded, there were still dangers to be avoided, there was still the possibility of annoying someone and having certain privileges or limbs removed from you. That said, if you did your time well, it was not that bad a place to be, considering we were all guilty. Remember that scene in “Shawshank Redemption”, well we were the opposite, putting our hands up whilst making a deal.

 

            So, Enrico, he had done time before, so to speak, though this may have been harder time than the first time. But he was not a young man any more, he lacked the strength he had in his youth and seemed genuinely perturbed by how the world would perceive him upon his death. I joked with him that it was a little late by then, but he assured me that there was still time to do something.

 

            I assumed it was just nerves on his recent imprisonment and the subject was not broached for the next three months. We kept getting reports from the outside, the fall of the Government, the death toll rising from the powdered milk scandal, the disappearances of his former staff, the detainment of his second wife, the fact that no-one visited him. Prison gives you time and space to collect your thoughts, and he had a lot to think about.

 

            He would serve all fifteen years of his sentence, that was part of the deal, meaning that he would have been 87 when he was freed. He had not lived the sort of life that gives your body the chance to push 90 and was resigned to dying in jail. He followed the case of the last little girl to die, directly, of the adulterated milk, that death seemed to knock the stuffing out of him. Somehow, he got his eldest son to visit him.

 

            He confided in me the contents of those meetings, and the plans that arose from them. His son was very reticent to visit initially, but feared that Enrico’s health may take a turn for the worse. The first meeting was tense, and Enrico knew that he would need time to win his son over again. He would ask me at night if he could ever undo the wrong that he had done and, if so, how? Those were questions I didn’t have the answer to, but knew that once he started pondering them, they would come.

 

            The visits became more frequent and cordial. One night, he told me that he had the answer, that he could make amends. He still had a sizeable amount of money that the authorities had failed to seize. Through his son, he was going to set up an association that would care for people affected by the tragedies that he had caused. He would use the money, along with his innate knowledge of the workings of the stock market to use the funds for something good for once.

 

            I told him that was a great idea and that perhaps they might reduce his sentence because of it, but he told me that I didn’t get it. No-one must ever know, were his words, his and his son’s condition. He would mastermind the investments and finance them, but nobody could know of his involvement. He felt that if he did it anonymously it would count, otherwise he would be a fraud, if there could be no adulation, there would be no temptation.

 

            And so, he spent the last five years of his life dedicating his time to the opening of schools, health centres and sporting facilities in the towns and cities that had suffered from his greed in the past. All done in an altruistic and faceless manner. He could not return the dead to their families, but he could make sure that they had a better start in life than would have otherwise been the case without the association.

           

            He never got to see the inside of any of the schools or buildings that has money paid for, but considered the detailed reports brought to him by his son sufficient praise of his work. Rome had suffered the most under his tenure, and Rome is where the most reparation was performed. In one of the poorest areas, on a single street that lost six infant children, a state-of-the-art primary and pre-school education facility was opened that would ensure the district’s children the education that they deserved. Parents were invited to take part in the children’s education and absenteeism became a thing of the past when the latter actually received a payment based on their child’s performance. His hope was that these schools would become the breeding ground for future doctors and others to offer society something more than power and pilfering.

 

            Money was no object, he seemed to make it grow from nowhere. At first his son questioned some of the investments, but was soon proven wrong, after a while, he left the dabbling to the master. They bought a football side on the brink of folding and turned it into a stable and functioning outfit in less than two seasons, operating a strict policy of giving a chance to local talent and involving the local community in all aspects of the club’s running. This allowed for not just the football side to flourish at a grassroots level, but also allowed for the forming of female sides, a basketball team and, just before his death, a highly-competitive swimming team in the new pool that the association built.

 

            ‘People should know what you have done.’ I said to him time and time again. But he responded always with the same answer: ‘The essence of what I am doing is that they don’t. It has no value if the praise is for me.’ With time I began to understand him. When you have time to ponder, often answers come through searching. I saw him change as he received knowledge of the work he was doing. His son brought him detailed reports which they mulled over. At first, they were concerned that their secret might get out, but it is incredible how fast someone can become yesterday’s news.

 

            His son basically recruited people for a charitable organisation that ran the activities funded by Enrico. The name Fettuccini was still mud, so his role was kept to the side, at least in the eyes of the public, it was deemed overly obvious to have him at the helm. I don’t know how he felt as I was never allowed to speak to him, but I spoke greatly with Enrico about those plans, and remember the sparkle in his eyes when the ideas turned into plans that turned into actions that turned into facts. I believe he died a happy man, that he was waiting for one last act of generosity before leaving us.

 

            The University project came into being very swiftly. He had the schools but knew that he was not going to live long enough to see any of the primary school students graduate and begin a degree course. He laughed and cursed the choice of the fake heart attack as it seemed that the organ did not like being the butt of his joke and came back to haunt him in the form of angina. That said, approaching eighty, literally anything can come along and make things worse for you.

 

            I would say that the placidity he obtained from those actions bought him extra time, time to complete the university project, at least for the first intake, for the chance to see the first students in the lecture theatres that he built, taking the first steps towards a future that they might not have had otherwise.

 

            The University would be structured along the lines of the schools, in the sense that the places would be for underprivileged families, tuition would be free, indeed there would even be grants to pay for residences and living allowances during their studies. Students with potential were earmarked in the year before the University opened so that they could take up the invitation of the initial places. Many of them had not considered tertiary education as a viable option due to their families’ economic circumstances, now there was a chance for them to realise their potential. Again, the families were encouraged to participate, even to receive whenever needed, these were families that had never enjoyed such a level of inclusion, had never been considered worthy of such lavish treatment. At the lowest levels of society, though often from where the greatest come, attitudes were changing.

 

            The fulcrum of Enrico’s policy was that this was not mere gifting of his wealth to purchase atonement. Students, players, workers, members and others were expected to perform to a reasonable level, and to have reasons to want to excel themselves. And it worked, crime levels dropped in poor areas, relations with the police changed, they took their chance. He devoted the last moments of his life to making people happy whilst those who remembered him were sure he rotted in jail as the murdering scumbag he was portrayed to be. On his death bed, he watched the opening ceremony his University with tears in his eyes, enjoying the pride in the eyes of the students who still could not believe they were undergraduates.

 

            After the ceremony had finished, he spent some time with his son and I was allowed to return. His son had left him, against doctors’ orders, a bottle of Chianti from 1972, the year he graduated. We opened the bottle and toasted, he thanked me for my friendship and loyalty, offering various posts to my family members for the future, I said there was no need, but he insisted. We finished the bottle and he retired to his bunk. ‘My work here is done, dear friend’. With that he smiled and left us.”

 

And with a further smile, his former cellmate also left. Everyone had just supposed that Fettuccini’s last years were spent in isolation, seemingly unrepentant or at least in no way bothered about what the world thought of him. The show’s producers frantically tried to verify the story that they had just heard and discovered that in every Fettuccini sponsored facility, there was a safe with the combination that the cellmate gave. Inside there was a photo of Enrico and his son, and the deeds to the property. While still live on air, the presenters confirmed that this part of the story was true. People had not questioned the veracity of other statements, yet there seemed to be a need to ensure the truthfulness of his later works.

 

The second presenter, who never really got the hang of things. Simply said “thank you for watching.” A master of the understatement. The credits began to roll, and the audience made its way out of the studio. There was only one topic of conversation on the everyone’s lips. Had the devil done enough to be forgiven for his sins?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1]At the time of these recordings, Fettuccini was involved in a series of trials for embezzlement during his first time in office and had fallen spectacularly from grace.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: